AmusED

Amy's Whimsical Musings

Just Make Stuff – Radical Transparency as the New CV

“Is there more evidence than evidence?”

IMG_4053

That’s the question my dear friend Alan Levine posed in in recent blog post “Seeking Evidence of Badge Evidence”.

As far as credentialing goes, I’ve always been a fan of Open Badges (key word is “open”) if they are framed in the Doug Belshaw framework (I respect and admire that guy very much). I think, like anything they are misunderstood and often misused. Some might be issued with no metadata attached, becoming more of a digital certificate than a tool that can point to exactly what one has accomplished. In other cases the issuer might write criteria in lieu of what the “evidence” actually is (I think both are needed).

But let’s look at the pink elephant in the room…

FullSizeRender

Why do we need “evidence” if your work is evident?

For many years I have spoken at conferences about radical transparency and its place in the classroom. I might be a little “out there” for some, but I truly believe that students need to cultivate a positive digital presence early on, and that that presence – with all the work they put out there – will in essence become their CV (or transcript if the point is to get you into university). It must be noted I use the term “digital presence” because I think the commonly used “footprint” is far too past tense and the term “tattoo” has negative connotations in addition to being something more passive (a tattoo happens to you) rather than active (you create how you want to be seen on the Web over time through your work).

IMG_4056

It’s About Walking the Walk

FullSizeRender_1

I’ve never been a fan of people who “talk” but don’t “walk”. In other words, I always think, as I evaluate someone, “what are you making?”; “what are you sharing?”

I get that not everyone is comfortable creating and distributing artifacts like videos, gifs, novels, poetry, music, or visual art. But they can curate and contextualize with their own thoughts and share that out. They can blog abut anything from their vegan food obsessions to media philosophy.

As a person who puts a lot of work out there- some of it admittedly not so great – I am privy to many viewer comments. In my 13 years of being fairly transparent on the Web, I must say it’s been for the most positive, but I have not come out completely unscathed. I learned a long time ago how to navigate through hurtful user reactions – ignore them. I know that is easier said than done but they key for me is to just keep making. Another mantra I like to use in response to naysayer is

Create Don’t Hate

IMG_4059

Andy Warhol has a lovely quote about this:

“Don’t think about making art- just get it done. Let everyone else decide whether they love it or hate it, but in the meantime, while they’re deciding, make even more art”

I would definitely rather call myself a maker rather than a decider.

 

What Counts as Evidence?

IMG_4060

I have, (and I think I can say this for Alan) perhaps, a different take on the world than most. I evaluate someone by their work not their work history. 

I’ve known too many people with amazing degrees and career experience who fall unfortunately short when it comes down to being original, nice, or even productive. That’s all I ask: have something new or interesting to say or contribute, be kind and hold up the work of your peers, and work hard making stuff. Yes, I’d be a terrible HR person, I know. But this attitude has really helped me as a teacher – I’ve never judged kids by their record as “honour students”, or for that matter see them as any less creative than I am. We were co-creators and co-learners, to reference the esteemed Howard Rheingold. 

Many times (ok oftentimes) my students’ work – be it blog posts, essays, movies, poetry, what have you – was WAY better than something I could ever do. But the thing is I never considered myself to be an authority whose job it was to judge them. I’d rather have students work through their own evaluations with extensive guided reflections (my favourite were vlog reflections in which they responded thoughtfully to prompts).

My students’ work was transparent – from the first day of school they created personal blog portfolios on which they posted every bit of course work (plus contextualized with an introduction and reflection). They established Twitter accounts to take part in course chats and backchannels (these were then archived in Storify for “evidence” of participation, though I was always seeking a more streamlined approach to assess the quality of participation). They maintained YouTube accounts to house all their media production (mostly vlogs but a few more creative film projects). They used their school Google accounts to hop on to G+ so they could contribute to our class G+ Community or our Summer Reading community. All this contributed to them

being Googled well

I think Will Richardson came up with that phrase and it has stuck with me. I wanted my students, when Googled by future bosses or college entrance folks, to find the good stuff – the academic and artistic goodies attached to their REAL NAME (yes, I did teach high school not kindergarten and there is a difference). And do you know what? It worked. I remember one girl came up to me as a Senior and said she was pleased that when she Googled herself her (very thoughtful) blog and film projects from 9th grade History popped up and not the sketchy party photos from Facebook. Other students returned from college and let me know that although it often seemed overwhelming at the time, learning to manage a variety of social media accounts, produce creative work and distribute it across channels was quite helpful to them in university.

FullSizeRender

Man’s Lust for Classification

I came across this yesterday when discussing my post with a friend who called me out about paying to much heed to semantics.

12801169_10206143998304978_8250081956459302652_n

 

The problem is, most people DO want to classify, to define. There is security in knowing if something has a stamp of approval. That’s why we like certain name brands, even though everything is probably made in the same factory in China anyway. Letter grades sure as heck don’t cut it, and most of us don’t have much esteem for standardized tests. Performance and criteria-based assessments are the best we have right now, and that is where open badging and micro-credentials in general come in. The reason I like them is because they

honour the informal learning we all do

This shift from mostly formal learning to a hybrid of formal and informal learning experiences is profound. At an increasing rate, people are carving out their personal learning paths, and they want to keep track of what they have accomplished. Having a “mobile backpack” full of badges aids in this (particularly since it is tied to the person not a platform).

IMG_4062

Reputation as Currency

FullSizeRender_1

The long and short of it is, until we move to a world in which you can only prove yourself by what you do not what you say you do, then we need things like badges, certificates and degrees. I do think, however, that with our ubiquitous archiving devices and the ability to basically life log, transparency will eventually win out. The trouble will be making sense of it all- oh, and perhaps authenticity and honesty, but since we are human that will always be an issue.

 

Teacher as Amplifier

FullSizeRender_2

The best way to help students is to provide opportunities for students to create and share their work. You perhaps will need to set up an infrastructure to do this (for example, I helped students create their blog sites, then had a blog roll on my course blog so we could all easily see each other’s sites). Part of this is inspiring students to get creating – so think up some great projects now.

Help students navigate different social media spaces and use social media in the context of the curriculum. We did Twitter backchannels when we watched TED talks or student presentations, had a Twitter question of the week, and tweeted during socratic discussions.

Amplify students’ work by sharing it. To do this you will – no surprise here- have to be a connected educator yourself. If you don’t have a lot of followers. make sure you know which hashtags to use so that the appropriate audience will find the work serendipitously. Students should understand how to leverage hashtags, too.

Why not use the #FF (follow Friday) tag to follow a student’s blog, video channel, Instagram or website?

FullSizeRender

One reminder…

you can make the coolest “stuff” in the world and still be a jerk. So in this ever-shrinking, uber-connected space that flirts between the “IRL” and the virtual, it is beyond important to play nice. Here are some tips:

 

build up the work of others, and attribute everything

refrain from negativity as much as possible – populate the Web with pleasing things 

if you get jealous that someone is better, make more stuff (you will get better too and it distracts)

ok, just accept people will be better or their work will be more popular (but realize there is a niche for everyone)

share your own work freely (but make it unique enough so people will know it’s yours)

encourage remix of your work (remix is the heart of creativity- embrace it)

IMG_4066

A few years ago I did an Ignite at ISTE called “#Daretoshare :Transparency is the New Black”

 

 

 

Advertisements

7 comments on “Just Make Stuff – Radical Transparency as the New CV

  1. HJ.DeWaard
    February 27, 2016

    Amy, this is post is digging deeper into my thinking about digital identities and persona.

    What qualifies us and makes us ‘expert’ in creating and making within our own fields of endeavour? What’s left out when we share our CVs or resumés? How do we craft our ‘positive digital presence’?

    I see echoes from your words to my thinking – for me it’s a digital self portrait that I paint for other’s to see or support my students as they begin painting. I’m not an artist, but can manage to create an image that represents my passions, interests, issues, biases. Take a look: https://fiveflames4learning.wordpress.com/2015/12/11/mirror-mirror-on-my-screen-is-it-my-self-portrait-you-have-seen/ and let me know what you see! 🙂
    Helen

  2. Mark McGuire
    March 1, 2016

    I found this via a Twitter post by @hj_dewaard. Very positive and uplifting post, Amy! I love your illustrations, and the videos are terrific. I’m amazed with what you have managed to do — and with high school students! There’s no excuse for not doing similar things in our university courses.

  3. MrHooker
    April 22, 2016

    Great post Amy! I really resonated with a couple of the tips. I like the Andy Warhol rationale/quote to just keep creating. I know it isn’t always going to be good, but put it out there. I also like your use of the word presence instead of “footprint”. It’s a small change but makes a big difference in terms of definition.

    Thanks for putting yourself out there and for creating a better world!

  4. Ken Bauer
    June 7, 2016

    Thanks again Amy, I already thanked you on Twitter and Facebook which is more about sharing the work with my followers; see above: “build up the work of others, and attribute everything” which is very important to me personally.

    I’m working on retooling the #abolishGrading I did with my students this past semester in order to improve it for the upcoming one. We already have them all blog in a connected courses setup (following Alan Levine’s guidance which I’ve put into practice since January 2014) and my students love being able to look at each other’s work. They even run across the blog posts from the previous year of students. Nice!

    Right now I am trying to find the balance of doing some nifty analytics and make that visible to my students without putting too much emphasis on the numbers (again). I really want them to care about the learning and less about those numbers.

    I need to blog about what I did with this in 2016, the only post I have that talks about this is on my post about student comments on my teaching evaluations where I also include some video logs that the students made as a reflection of their semester in my class (1st semester undergrad programming in C++ or Python). Feel free to check that out over here: http://blog.kenbauer.me/2016/05/24/teaching-evaluations-comments-good-bad-ugly/

  5. Pingback: Day 2 – Who is still with us? – My daily adventure in the "Internet fingerprint" course

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

fuchsia blue

learning development change

Learning Freewheel

Redefining Learning Experiences

EdgeMaking Riffs

My personal woodshed for new ideas

thescriptedtangent

I beg to differ

Novel Alliances

Allied Perspectives on Literature, Art, and New Media

Personal Knowledge Mastery

seek > sense > share

Becoming An Educationalist

A topnotch WordPress.com site

Marian Sanabria

E-Learning and Digital Cultures

leahford

IB Theory of Knowledge

TIC TOK

It's time to think

Autopsy of TOK

Interested? Keep Scrolling

Life of Nate

The Supper Awesome Life of NTG

~Ariel the Mermaid~

A fine WordPress.com site

vitor's theories

My knowledge of the theories.

Kyle Maxwell TOK

Kyle Maxwell TOK

Inside Mski's Head

What is knowledge

TOK: Tyler On Knowledge

Life is like a taco. Embrace it.

Joey's Crib

Pretty sweet.

%d bloggers like this: