Amy's Whimsical Musings
– so ends this intriguing Wired article by Clive Thompson.
I’ve been pondering GIFS and other short bursts of content for the past few weeks, particularly since the illustrious Jim Groom “gave good GIF” in an #etmooc presentation a couple of weeks ago.
I’m full of questions, such as:
* does repetition change meaning?
* why are we drawn to the infinite moments – making time stand still?
* can one be GIF-literate? can you learn to think/speak in GIF? what about in 140 character tweets?
* do the best memes come from accidents, or are they meticulously planned?
* can a GIF express an previously inexpressible emotion? Is this visual perception as emotional shorthand?
* how has media “come alive” with our ability to mashup /remix/ transform?
* is cinemography really just a strand of voyeurism (and if so, is that a bad thing?)
* is something as abbreviated as a GIF or tweet capable of delivering useful information? inspiring deep thinking?
Clive Thompson of Wired explains the phenomena as
It’s this shift in what we consider valuable and poignant that I am interested in.
In his Gutenberg Parenthesis theory, Professor Thomas Pettit discusses the breakdown in categories we are now experiencing.
For some time now I’ve been puzzled why some people don’t “get” my history-based musc video parodies , because they feel they are too brief and superficial as opposed to a full lecture, course, or textbook chapter. Um, ok. I usually explain they are not meant to replace the full lesson, but to inspire thought or interest. But I’m taking that back. Indeed, I think brevity can be more poignant, as long as it (image, phrase, or action) is
After all, we are not supposed to be force-feeding our audience with ideas, but rather attempting to light a fire, right?
If my student turned in a final assessment like mine for #edcmoc would I think any lower of her? No, I’d think she spent time SYNTHESIZING and CREATING – both time-consuming and demonstrative of understanding and critical thinking. (this is in response to a very ugly debate happening on Metafilter about my work)
My attention span has become altered by my technology use – I get fatigued when I have to read more or listen to someone speak for more than 140 characters. That might be an ever-so-slight exaggeration, but you get my drift. I also find that when I compose a presentation, for example, I think ahead (metacognition I guess) if I can “craft” any tweetable phrases.
I call this
I don’t know if this is necessarily negative or positive, it just is.
So what do you think? Can you answer any of my questions? Do you have an anecdote to share? Are we becoming a culture of quips?
Here’s a gif I just tried using a snippet from my French Revolution video
Changing the Future of Work. One Human at a Time.
learning development change
Redefining Learning Experiences
My personal woodshed for new ideas
I beg to differ
Allied Perspectives on Literature, Art, and New Media
seek > sense > share
A topnotch WordPress.com site
E-Learning and Digital Cultures
IB Theory of Knowledge
It's time to think
Interested? Keep Scrolling
Think, Observe, Know
The Supper Awesome Life of NTG
A fine WordPress.com site
My knowledge of the theories.
Kyle Maxwell TOK
What is knowledge
Life is like a taco. Embrace it.