First watch this:
This was indeed life not too long ago. Until, perhaps, the “YOU” was inserted as a prefix to “TUBE”, among other advances.
In the ’80s, I recall watching Videodrome, primarily because my New Wave idol Deborah Harry of Blondie was starring.
Someone has uploaded the entire film here , but here’s a gist:
Talk about “participatory”! That scene is clearly dystopian, but I think offers a bit of insight into our present relationship with media and our devices. To what extent have we become part of our gadgetry, and how have our ipods, iPads, smart phones, GPS systems, laptops, and (soon to be) Google Glasses irrevocably transformed us as humans? What’s more, should we lament or get on with the program, as it were? After all, Darwin did say that
“it’s not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent…it is the one that is most adaptable to change”.
This was glaringly evident as I had the opportunity to speak – water-cooler fashion – with two of my talented colleagues – one a drama teacher and playwright, the other a professional musician. We were discussing the massive shift in audience / performer relationship given the ubiquity of mobile phones and WiFi in particular. The drama teacher was a tad perturbed by the distractions caused by “distracted” audience members texting, tweeting, or keeping tabs on their social media through performances. He was nostalgic for days of yore before the deluge of devices.
The musician reiterated that the audience “is what it is”, and that it would be best as a performer to embrace the paradigm shift and play along with the participatory culture enabled by technology. She quipped, profoundly:
Dinner theatre is inherently distracting. It’s rife with multi-tasking. One eye/ear on the actors and another on the roast beef.
On the plus side, it’s relaxed and informal, and potentially engaging, if the performers interact with the audience in some way.
She proposed that performers (and I would extend this to presenters and teachers) capitalize on 2 things:
1. the apparently innate human desire to participate, share, and be involved
2. the ability to engage with the audience as afforded by our communication technology
It might indeed be a little arrogant to expect full attention from any audience, if by “attention” you mean complete silence with eyes glued to the stage. But I think we need to change our definition of attention. Personally, I am more engaged with a speaker if I am tweeting soundbites or using the Internet to synchronously explore resources he shares. It’s even better if I’m able to have discourse with fellow audience members without disturbing the performance. Professional speakers need to pony up to the backchannel because
a. it’s not going away
b. the tweeters will provide you with free publicity
c. you can have fun WITH your audience for a change
The top speakers I’ve seen have actually set up a monitored backchannel and are adept at interacting with their audience in real time.
I’ve tried having students backchannel during a TED talk video or other presentation (although it takes a bit of training), and the results are fruitful. I’d rather have them contributing to the collective conversation (especially the introverted ones) than staring blindly at the screen and/or fiddling with non-relevant things on their computer.
Dana Boyd, who works with Henry Jenkins reminds us in this blog post that a “participatory culture” is one
So whether life (and teaching) is becoming more like dinner theatre or even a cocktail party, we know it is no longer a one-way street. We can’t expect zombie-like attention nor should we desire it. As performers, teachers, public speakers we need to
Bring on the backchannel, baby. And I’ll have a side of potatoes au gratin with the show, please.
Let the games begin
Learning Solutions that Activate Performance in Your Company
A new type of blovel. A blog based on the contents of a novel. Weekly chapters. Read & Comment. Read & Tweet. An old fashioned way to read. A new way to connect readers and authors. Loving the stories that bring us together. Also available from Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback or as eBook. Enjoy the adventure!
A Blog about Open and Online Education
intersection of community, learning and technology
Geflipte klas/flipped classroom, Mooc's, digitale didactiek, hoger onderwijs, blended learning, CSCL
thoughts and reflections on the EDC MOOC
Winter reflections on technology and potential shared learning experiences ~ Bravo to #EDCMOOC
If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.
Statistics + Connectivism = Pure Awesomeness
Music Educator, professional portfolio and blog
Digital pedagogy, open education, composition, and literature
There's no reality except the one contained within us. That's why so many people live an unreal life. They take images outside them for reality and never allow the world within them to assert itself. by Herman Hesse
The Weblog and Portfolio of Thomas Joseph Okon
Digital cultures, e-learning, and humanity
I use the internet to read about science, tech, politics and current events. Sometimes I even learn something!
This WordPress.com site is the bee's knees
Part time bellydancer, part time world explorer...
Politics, Healthcare, and other Social Issues
Pingback: Risking taking risks | debseed
Pingback: Critical crap detection | debseed
Pingback: How Life is Like Dinner Theatre: On Embracing Participatory Culture | Autodidact
Reblogged this on Autodidact and commented:
Great post from my EDCMOOC about audience.
Hi Amy, do you know Jacques Rancière? He not only wrote my favorite book ever: “The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation” but also “The Emancipated Spectator”. I think you might enjoy reading a keynote he wrote about it: http://digital.mica.edu/departmental/gradphoto/public/Upload/200811/Ranciere%20%20spectator.pdf
Pingback: Etmooc Musings
Pingback: Through the Noise: Balance in a Digital World | The Online Teacher